|
Post by Ampeg J on Jan 19, 2007 0:22:55 GMT -5
Ask yourselves this: Why do both Republicans and Democrats not want/allow Representatives from the Libertarian/Consitiution/Green/Insert-fave-third-party-here/ to the dance when it comes to debates?
*FEAR*
There just might be a good idea here, and new though there that might ACTUALLY effect positive change?
*I must leave this thread now before the hosts decide i am a radical far beyond what i actually am*
B)
|
|
|
Post by Christy The Admin on Jan 19, 2007 10:32:03 GMT -5
A radical? Ha ha ha ha ha. Actually I completely agree with you on this one. When it's only two parties, everyone knows what will happen and it's almost always what the two parties want. Add in anyone else and their power base diminishes. I've only met one worthwhile politician in my whole life so far and her name is Jan Judy. I wouldn't trust the rest farther than Hawkeye's disabled cat can throw them.
|
|
|
Post by dagtoking1 on Jan 22, 2007 9:11:28 GMT -5
Still I was happy to see Hillary enter the race. If I were voting today Senator Clinton would have my vote. I'll be paying very close attention to all the candidates however. One thing that is for sure, I won't be voting republican.
|
|
|
Post by Ampeg J on Jan 30, 2007 19:21:27 GMT -5
I can't vote for Hillary. Sorry. That is the last person on earth... well, ok, near the top of the list... of people i would NEVER vote for. I might vote for a Republican, it just depends on who they offer us. Personally i want to vote for a FAIR TAX Libertarian. and both Dems and Reps can kiss my backside
|
|
|
Post by gusdanger on Jun 16, 2008 0:29:55 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by dagtoking1 on Jun 16, 2008 10:13:41 GMT -5
I voted for Hillary in the primary not that it mattered much in Florida. I was disappointed when she suspended her campaign.
Trying to impeach Bush would just cost tax payers even more and hardly seems worth it at this point.
|
|